|Thanks very much for visiting my page here. I also have a page in YouTube site:|
I believe in true Buddhism of Nichiren Daishonin, who defined himself as the only true Buddha of this period. There can be various kinds of people, related to this religion in one way or another. There can be those who really follow, just follow, are following with only little faith, choose to hide their good heart of the Buddhist faith in their appearances, or change this religion only to enhance their authoritarianism (the first category), which likely contain great deals of discriminating prejudices, backward jealousies, unchecked greed, and irrational rage, etc..
I have heard someone in late 20th century claimed to be reappearance of the true Buddha, Nichiren Daishonin, possibly besides some other identifications, in an attempt to credit self as a founder of a newly born religion. Obviously I, as a believer of the true Buddhism, don't and can't agree with this type of new spiritual doctrines, regardless whether such declarations were coming from lay people or clergy institutions. Furthermore, being in priesthood is not only having no guarantees for spiritual purity but also possessing no immunity against spiritual staleness, authoritarianism corruption, and humanistic incompetence. Nichiren Daishonin clearly warned his followers of this type of priests, who appear in public as if they are big-shots sages while in fact they are consumed with own various greed and are content with own heartless state of mind toward the true Buddhism.
If that authoritarian group, of the first categorical personnel, make up fictitious accusations, especially fortified by their own manipulating lies through changing this Buddhism, against any other groups of people, or on any particular individuals (the second category), so long the all second perimeter’s personnel, on this subject, are basically positive, I like to regard any states of set-backs in reality, tangible or intangible, which are created through such negative accusations, as pure hallucinations. I like to decide that, while phantom states can damage victims’ lives, ill-intended imaginations are always uselessly within what they are and, at the end, those are essentially all mere phantoms. I think, origins of such lies will ultimately fade themselves out from realm of reality accordingly. Additionally, I suppose what I just said may be increasingly making sense with typical acts of bulling, with plenty of falsified facts, as well through internet or its equivalent tools.
(the latest revision: 2:40 am 11-21-13)